Lưu trữ cho từ khóa: Satoshi Nakamoto

Money Electric: A Bitcoin Mystery review — Satoshi ‘whodunnit’ lacks killer blow

★★★★☆ | Cullen Hoback’s documentary is an entertaining watch, and uses the same tactics as a crime drama to keep his suspect hidden until the very end.

Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery created a huge splash when a trailer was released by HBO, with the documentary promising to finally unmask Satoshi Nakamoto

It’s a film by Cullen Hoback, who says he first became interested in BTC seven years ago, concerned about the dangers of digital surveillance.

At 100 minutes long, it’s a chunky watch — and given its debut on a mainstream channel, has to walk an awkward tightrope between serving two very different audiences.

For those who know little about Bitcoin, there’s nifty graphics explaining how blockchains work, and a concise but elegantly written canter through the cryptocurrency’s 15-year history.

There’s also clever use of archive footage from TV shows and films, with BTC mining illustrated using a scene from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory where a golden ticket is found.

But the real aim of this documentary isn’t to explain how Bitcoin works — that’s been done before — instead, the goal is to identify its pseudonymous founder.

And in explaining why this is so necessary, Hoback argues that Satoshi’s stash of one million BTC makes it a matter of urgency as crypto becomes integrated with traditional finance, as there could be mass panic if these coins are suddenly spent.

The suspects

In some ways, Money Electric comes across like a “whodunnit,” featuring interviews with some of the best-known faces in the industry.

There’s a chat with JAN3 CEO Samson Mow, who’s depicted as a “Bitcoin ambassador” as he flies from country to country, encouraging governments to adopt it as legal tender.

Mow describes fiat as “a house of cards built on a house of cards built on a house of cards” while sitting on a private jet — ammo for critics who would say he could be talking about BTC.

That then leads us to Blockstream co-founder Adam Back, described as Mow’s boss, who claims he might be the first person that Satoshi Nakamoto contacted about his big idea.

Hoback delves deep into Back’s past and spends a lot of time sifting through the evidence that could suggest he is Satoshi, bringing plenty of compelling receipts along the way.

The filmmaker notes how the cryptographer moved to Malta around the time BTC was created — a country that coincidentally happens to be a tax haven.

Back’s also British — and that’s significant given how Satoshi appeared to use U.K. spelling, and included a headline from the London Times in Bitcoin’s genesis block.

Even though he claims to be a latecomer to BTC — claiming he was the “embarrassing late guy” by joining the BitcoinTalk forum four years after the cryptocurrency was created — Hoback points out that Back was editing the Bitcoin Wikipedia page long before then. Why? To name those who potentially could be Satoshi Nakamoto, without naming himself.

At one point, Back looks physically uncomfortable when Hoback bluntly asks who Satoshi could be. There’s another awkward moment at the Bitcoin 2022 conference in Miami, when Mow teases Back by suggesting that he’s the one who brought BTC into being.

Cullen Hoback | Source: HBO trailer

Unmasking the ‘culprit’

But just like a good crime drama features a scene with the actual murderer long before they are caught — meaning the viewer is aware of who they are but doesn’t suspect them — Hoback spends a little time with Peter Todd as he goes caving in an abandoned WWII bunker.

An early part of the documentary shows how he learned to code at a young age and became a controversial figure in the Bitcoin space — with Todd jokingly telling Hoback that he is Satoshi. Todd’s controversial emails with a man called “John Dillon” also emerged, who claimed he worked in a relatively high position in intelligence. Watching this, he didn’t seem like a serious suspect… until the documentary’s finale.

For someone who’s well-versed in Bitcoin, you could argue that it’s only the last 20 minutes of Money Electric you need. It features Back and Todd exploring steelworks ruins in the Czech Republic and Hoback confronting the pair about everything he’s learned during filming.

There’s a cut to Hoback making a dramatic realization while scouring the BitcoinTalk forum, which appears to show Todd finishing one of Satoshi’s sentences — days after he opened an account on the website. The filmmaker speculates that Todd may have posted using the wrong profile, meaning a simple human error would have blown his secret wide open.

Todd laughs as he’s confronted with this theory, with Hoback mentioning that he seemed to have a pretty good recollection given the post in question was 13 years ago. 

But what follows is a flashback through key interviews earlier in the documentary — the breadcrumbs that have led Hoback to believe Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto. There’s the 2001 email he sent to Adam Back as a teenager, Roger Ver claiming that Todd “always wants to prove he’s the smartest guy in the room,” and questions over his ties to John Dillon. There’s a clip of Todd denying he could code in C++, too, even though an old bio said he had this skill. 

Hoback goes on to claim that Peter Todd and John Dillon could be the same person — a theory that Todd dismisses as “ludicrous.” 

“It’ll be very funny when you put it into the documentary,” Todd laughingly says. “Bitcoiners will be happy if you go down this route — journalists missing the point in a way that’s really funny.”

A final piece of evidence shows a message where Todd describes himself as a “world-leading expert on how to sacrifice your Bitcoins” — perhaps an admission that he no longer has access to Satoshi Nakamoto’s stash — with Hoback suggesting Todd turned to this pseudonym over fears Bitcoin wouldn’t be taken seriously because of his young age.

Peter Todd | Source: HBO trailer

A definitive answer?

Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery is a well-produced documentary with a surprising outcome — and in the aftermath, Todd maintains there are “hundreds, even thousands of people who could have created Bitcoin.” 

At first, it’s easy to worry that it’s going to be another cliched film — with one of the first visuals showing a hooded man wearing an anonymous mask. A mashup of news anchors declaring BTC is dead then follows, complete with graphics showing how this coin has accelerated in value over the years.

But Money Electric is a literate show that isn’t shy when dealing with BTC’s intricacies. The cryptocurrency’s downsides are acknowledged, but key players within the industry are given plenty of time to get their point across. We witness Bitcoin’s excesses over the years, with Hoback describing Bitcoin maximalism and “orange-pilling” as “pretty f****** annoying.” There’s short shrift for NFTs, mention of Ethereum’s cringeworthy conferences, and criticism of how central bank digital currencies could end up surveilling all of our transactions.

Hoback’s conclusions are compelling and unexpected — so much so that Todd wasn’t even named in a Polymarket bet speculating on who would be identified as Satoshi. But realistically, this documentary has failed to deal a killer blow that settles this matter once and for all, and the crypto community is already poking holes in the documentary’s narrative.

For now, it’s safe to say Satoshi’s identity remains far from certain, but there’s a prescient quote from Peter Todd as he goes caving early on in the film.

“It’s unlikely it’ll collapse on our heads, but one day it will.”

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Peter Todd-inspired meme coin YOURMOM skyrockets over 4000% in live trading

Bitcoin developer Peter Todd’s snarky reply to an X user’s post asking about the name of his pets has been turned into a viral meme coin that has soared past 130% in the past 24 hours. Todd was recently claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, by an HBO documentary.

Contrary to the HBO documentary’s claims, Canadian Bitcoin developer Peter Todd has denied the fact that he is Satoshi Nakamato. But that didn’t stop the crypto enthusiasts from making various meme coins linked to him.

The meme token with the ticker $YOURMOM, inspired by Todd’s post on X, has surged past 4000% according to data on GeckoTerminal. The Solana-powered token is currently trading at $0.002647 with a market cap of $2.4 million in mere hours since its launch on Oct. 9.

The birth of the $YOURMOM token started when one X user told Todd that he was “all over the Solana memesphere”. The user with the handle @iwantitmore_sol then proceeded to ask the developer if he had any pets and what their names are, with the intent of feeding the meme token trend of naming coins after animals.

Todd responded sarcastically by telling the X user that the name of his pet was “your mom”. Meme token creators saw his post and ran with it. At the time of writing, there have been a total of four Solana tokens made in the past 16 hours with the ticker YourMom, some even bearing Todd’s picture as the coin’s icon.

In a similar fashion, Solana meme coin creators were quick to create tokens based on Len Sassaman and his two cats, Odin and Sasha, when he was the Polymarket bettors’ top pick for Satoshi’s true identity.

After the HBO documentary named Peter Todd as Satoshi and not Sassaman, prices for memecoins created in honor of the cryptographer took a nosedive. According to data on CoinMarketCap, the token SASHA, named after Sassaman’s orange cat, has dropped 88.21% in the past 24 hours.

The same can be said about Odin, Sassaman’s other cat-inspired meme token, that saw its price plummet by nearly 90% in the hours following the release of the HBO documentary, based on GeckoTerminal.

On Oct. 8, HBO’s documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” claimed that Canadian Bitcoin developer Peter Todd was Satoshi Nakamoto.

One of the main reasons mentioned by documentary producer Cullen Hobak is a series of cryptic online posts, one of which Todd called himself “the world’s leading expert on how to sacrifice your Bitcoins”. This was interpreted as a veiled admission that alluded to him destroying access to the estimated 1.1 million BTC attributed to Nakamoto.

The documentary further fueled speculation with claims that Todd once accidentally posted from Satoshi’s account on the BitcoinTalk forum in 2010.

Even before the documentary aired, Todd has been adamant in denying theories that point to him as Bitcoin’s true creator. On Oct. 8, he responded to a comment on X asking him to come out and deny HBO’s claim, to which the developer wrote “I am not Satoshi.”

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

HBO points to Peter Todd as Satoshi, but the crypto community is skeptical

HBO’s documentary ‘Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery’ revealed Canadian Bitcoin developer Peter Todd as Satoshi Nakamoto, but the crypto community is not convinced.

Cullen Hobak, the producer of the highly anticipated documentary, provides several pieces of alleged evidence in the 100-minute-long feature that led to the conclusion that Todd, an early figure in the cryptocurrency space, was Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator.

Todd has been a Bitcoin Core Developer contributing to the cryptocurrency space for several years. He first became involved with cryptography and blockchain-related technologies at a young age, developing an interest in these fields in his teenage years.

His earliest documented engagement with Bitcoin dates back to the late 2000s when, at around 23 years old, he was already active in the crypto community, soon after the publication of the Bitcoin white paper in 2008.

In a 2019 podcast episode of What Bitcoin Did, Todd revealed that he was about 15 years old when he began communicating with early Bitcoin contributors like Hal Finney and Hashcash inventor Adam Back. These early interactions helped shape his later contributions to the Bitcoin space and cryptography in general.

In a 2018 interview with crypto.news, Todd revealed he worked as an analog electronics designer and a geophysics startup before his pivot to Bitcoin. 

He officially started working as a Bitcoin Core Developer at Coinkite in July 2014 and later held major roles, including serving as chief scientist at projects like Mastercoin and Dark Wallet.

Why is Todd Satoshi?

The key reason behind naming Todd stems from a collection of circumstantial evidence pieced together by Hobak, one of which is his cryptic online posts — notably one where he referred to himself as “the world’s leading expert on how to sacrifice your Bitcoins” — which is interpreted as veiled admissions, suggesting he may have destroyed access to the estimated 1.1 million BTC attributed to Nakamoto. 

The documentary further fueled speculation with claims that Todd once posted from Satoshi’s account on the BitcoinTalk forum in 2010, allegedly by accident. 

Additionally, Todd is credited with being a key advocate for Replace-by-Fee (RBF), a controversial topic within the community that proposed a mechanism that would allow a past transaction to be replaced by a new transaction that offers a higher fee. The documentary implied that this technical suggestion could have only come from someone with deep knowledge of Bitcoin’s original code—like Nakamoto.

Community debunks claims, and so does Todd

Despite these theories, Todd has continued to adamantly deny being Nakamoto, even before the documentary aired. More recently on Oct 8., he responded to a comment on X asking him to come out and deny HBO’s claim, to which the developer responded “I am not Satoshi.”

The crypto community was quick to debunk HBO’s claims. Web3 researcher Pix pointed out several key points where the documentary went wrong.

First, Pix noted that in 2008, Peter Todd was still finishing a fine arts degree and wasn’t even involved in the cryptography space, making it unlikely that he would have needed to use a pseudonym like Satoshi Nakamoto.

Next, Pix debunked HBO’s claim about a 2010 BitcoinTalk post, which suggested Todd accidentally revealed himself as Satoshi by not switching accounts. Pix argued that a follow-up post made 13 hours later was more likely a simple comment rather than evidence of a forgotten account switch.

Communication between Satoshi and Peter Todd on BitcoinTalk | Source: Pix on X.

Pix also addressed the RBF connection, explaining that Todd introduced RBF in 2014, years after Satoshi had already left the scene. HBO’s suggestion that this feature was pre-planned by Satoshi was dismissed as a major stretch.

Lastly, Pix tackled the “sacrificing bitcoins” message, clarifying that Todd’s cryptic comment was a joke about blockchain integrity, not an admission of destroying access to Satoshi’s 1.1 million BTC. This key piece of evidence, according to Pix, was taken wildly out of context, further discrediting HBO’s claims.

Among other non-believers was CryptoQuant researcher Ki Young Ju, who labeled the documentary “disgusting.”

“It’s baffling they reached this conclusion when all the #Bitcoin experts disagree,” Ju wrote in an Oct. 9 X post.

BitMEX Research also joined the skeptics, calling the evidence presented by HBO “clearly ridiculous” and stating that there was “zero reason” to believe Peter Todd is Satoshi. 

Prominent figures in the community like Adam Back, who has long been linked to Bitcoin’s early development, and Satoshi himself, did not support the theory either. Back, who was featured in the documentary, refrained from giving credence to the speculation and simply stated, “no one knows who Satoshi is.”

Other market observers called the conclusion nothing but sloppy journalism.

A surprise for Polymarket bettors

Polymarket, a popular prediction market platform, had listed odds on who HBO’s documentary would identify as Satoshi Nakamoto. However, Peter Todd was not initially included as a betting option. 

Bettors were primarily focused on figures like Nick Szabo and Len Sassaman, both of whom have been frequently speculated as Bitcoin’s creators. Other contenders included Hal Finney and Elon Musk among others.

This omission is another testament to how unexpected and widely dismissed the documentary’s claim about Todd truly was.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

LEN, SASHA, and ODIN: Len Sassaman-inspired meme coins pop up in the market before Satoshi identity reveal

In the lead-up to an HBO documentary’s Bitcoin founder reveal, memecoins inspired by Len Sassaman and his cats, Sasha and Odin, have started appearing on Solana, Ethereum, and Bitcoin networks.

After dominating the Polymarket betting pool on Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto‘s identity, Len Sassaman has gained popularity in crypto circles as many are hailing the deceased-cryptographer as the most likely candidate that will be unveiled in the HBO Documentary titled “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery”.

The documentary, set to premiere on Oct. 8, promises to reveal the the true identity behind the pseudonym that introduced Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

In the days leading up to the reveal, various memecoins have been created in honor of Len Sassaman and his cats. LEN, SASHA and Odin are just some of the memecoins that have sprouted in the past week thanks to Sassaman’s popularity amongst Polymarket bettors.

Sasha Cat’s token SASHA, a Solana memecoin modeled after Sassaman’s orange cat Sasha, has risen above 70% in the past day according to data from CoinMarketCap. Since its launch, SASHA has garnered has a market cap of $1.2 million.

Meanwhile, the memecoin named after Sassaman’s other cat, Odin, has been rising above 15% in the past day on GeckoTerminal. Though not as popular as SASHA, Odin has racked up a market cap of $236.000 in the two days its been on the market. The Odin memecoin is also powered by Solana.

Aside from the cryptographer’s cats, several memecoins were also created for Len Sassaman with the ticker LEN. LEN tokens on Solana and Ethereum were created by traders in the past week, running to a market capitalization of a few million before paring gains.

Another LEN token issued over four months ago, claiming to be the first to be issued on Solana, saw a price boost last week and has a market cap of over $1.6 million as of Monday.

On the day before the HBO Documentary is set to premiere, Sassaman’s odds are nearly at 40% based on the Polymarket “Who will HBO doc identify as Satoshi?” market. His rankings are closely followed by bettors who believe that Satoshi is a group of people or someone entirely off the board, with 38% odds.

The figure with second largest odds is Adam Back, CEO of Blockshare, with more than 7%. He will also make an appearance in the HBO documentary based on the trailer.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Who is Len Sassaman? The man leading Polymarket’s Bitcoin founder market

As HBO’s documentary promises to reveal Bitcoin’s creator, bettors on Polymarket speculate if Len Sassaman is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

Len Sassaman, a name not widely known outside of cryptography or cryptocurrency circles, has emerged as a key figure in the ongoing speculation around the true identity of Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto

With an upcoming HBO documentary teasing a revelation, bettors on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, are heavily wagering that Sassaman could be behind the pseudonym that introduced Bitcoin (BTC) to the world.

Polymarket allows users to place bets on various events, and speculation around Bitcoin’s founder is currently one of the most discussed topics. Bettors currently have Sassaman at a 46% chance of being named as Satoshi in the documentary.

Who was Len Sassaman? 

Sassaman, who passed away in 2011, was a cryptographer known for his contributions to privacy and decentralization. He worked on tools like Mixmaster, an email anonymizer that shielded users’ identities and was deeply embedded in the cryptographic community. 

His connection to Hal Finney, an early Bitcoin developer and the recipient of the first Bitcoin transaction from Satoshi, adds another layer to the speculation.

In 2008, Satoshi released the whitepaper that laid out the foundation of Bitcoin. Just as the digital currency was gaining momentum, Satoshi disappeared in 2011. Months later, Sassaman passed away; his wife reported his death as suicide. 

Some believe that Sassaman’s death could be linked to Satoshi’s disappearance, with conspiracy theories suggesting that Sassaman may have taken his life to protect his privacy and Satoshi’s identity.

Though Len Sassaman is leading the Polymarket bets, other candidates include Hal Finney, who holds 11% of the wagers. Finney was an early contributor to Bitcoin’s codebase and a prominent figure in the cryptographic world.

Despite all this speculation, many remain skeptical. Another contract on Polymarket shows that 83% of bettors believe the documentary won’t definitively prove Satoshi’s identity this year.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

HBO hints It has identified Bitcoin’s creator: What does this mean for the market?

HBO is set to release a documentary that will allegedly reveal the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.

The documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery”, set to be released on Oct. 8, sheds light on the identity of the Bitcoin (BTC) creator. The work belongs to Cullen Hoback, an Emmy nominee known for his project “Q: Into the Storm,” which investigated the QAnon conspiracy theory.

The film took three years to complete, and Blockstream CEO Adam Back was the key figure in investigating the main mystery of the BTC creator’s identity.

“Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” trailer

In an interview with Fast Company, Hoback also admitted that revealing Satoshi’s identity has real value for the industry. He noted that as Bitcoin becomes more accepted, the influence of someone with a significant supply of BTC increases (Satoshi is estimated to have had about 1 million BTC). Thus, an anonymous developer can significantly impact digital gold, including destroying part of its reserves.

“This would have been good for, you know, sort of Satoshi’s security and for the security and longevity of Bitcoin. But Satoshi didn’t do that — which means that the possibility still exists. So, trying to understand who is behind this, whether or not they would pull that lever, is very important.”

The mysterious person who changed everything

The official version says that the founder of the Bitcoin system is Satoshi Nakamoto, an anonymous developer hiding under an extraordinary pseudonym. In 2008, this unique person wrote the protocols of the innovative currency and christened it Bitcoin in its whitepaper “A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.”

Bitcoin whitepaper | Source: Bitcoin.org

Bitcoin was launched in January 2009, and since then, it has become the basis for many other cryptocurrencies and technologies. Satoshi was actively involved in the software’s early development, communicating with other developers and users through email and forums. However, in 2011, he suddenly disappeared from public discussion, handing over control of the project to another group of developers.

Despite Bitcoin’s rapid growth and financial success, Satoshi Nakamoto‘s true identity is still a mystery. Various theories claim that the developer could be a single programmer or a group of people, including famous figures in the fields of technology and cryptography. Computer scientist Nick Szabo and cryptographers David Chaum and Hal Finney are among the most popular candidates.

Interest in Nakamoto’s identity continues unabated. It has caused a wide resonance in society, giving rise to discussions about the future of financial systems, privacy, and decentralization. Satoshi Nakamoto remains one of the most discussed and enigmatic figures in the world of technology.

Satoshi’s identity revealed can shake the market

Since its appearance in 2009, BTC has become an important financial instrument, attracting attention as a store of value for those who distrust traditional currencies, a source of speculation for those excluded from traditional finance, and a means of payment for illicit activities, including cyber fraud and drug trafficking.

Bitcoin, backed by celebrities like Elon Musk, has reached a trillion-dollar value, leading central banks to view it as a potential threat to their systems.

“It has grown into a trillion-dollar asset class, acquiring such scale that even central banks have had to address it as a potential challenger to their own systems.”

Politico

Therefore, Politico journalists admitted that if the identity of Bitcoin’s creator is confirmed, this could cause significant fluctuations in global financial markets and even affect the U.S. election race, especially given Republican Donald Trump‘s support of BTC.

It is also assumed that Satoshi could become one of the richest people in the world, as he is estimated to control about 1.1 million BTC, which can currently be worth $66 billion. However, whether he has access to the keys to this amount is still being determined.

What other consequences could there be from the disclosure of Satoshi’s identity?

In addition to the factors voiced by Politico, the disclosure of Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity could affect the general microclimate in the crypto industry.

For example, if the father of Bitcoin turned out to be a well-known and respected expert in the field of technology, this could bring confidence to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

On the other hand, if Satoshi Nakamoto were found to be associated with shady characters or suspected illegal activities, it could negatively affect Bitcoin’s reputation. The cryptocurrency already faces image problems due to its use in illegal transactions, and such a scenario could only exacerbate these problems.

Overall, if Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity were to become clear, it would have a significant impact on the entire crypto market, similar to how Bitcoin itself affects the overall market dynamics and other altcoins.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Polymarket starts betting market on Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity

Polymarket traders have started betting on who the HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” will unmask as Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of Bitcoin.

On Oct. 4, Polymarket traders opened up a betting market for the big reveal of Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin (BTC).

The market is set to resolve on Oct. 8, the premiere date for the new HBO documentary titled “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery,” which promises to uncover the true identity of Bitcoin’s anonymous creator. In 2011, Satoshi disappeared from public view. Since then, a number of theories have emerged regarding who Satoshi truly is.

Polymarket betting market for Satoshi Nakamoto identity reveal — Oct. 4, 2024 | Source: Polymarket

At the time of writing, most Polymarket bettors believe Satoshi could be cryptographer Len Sassaman, as he holds the highest rank on the betting board, with 54% odds of him being the Bitcoin founder.

Many believe Sassaman could have been Satoshi due to his past academic works which were centered around cryptography. His work reflected his strong ideological commitment to privacy and decentralization. Another detail that conspirators have latched onto is the fact that Sassaman died by suicide in 2011, shortly after Satoshi stopped posting on Bitcoin’s forum BTCTalk.

The entry with the second highest votes is titled “Other/Multiple” with 38% odds, which predicts that the Bitcoin creator could either be multiple people or someone completely unknown or out of the crypto loop.

Aside from Sassaman, many also believe Hal Finney could have been Satoshi. With 16% odds, the American software developer was well-known for being an early Bitcoin contributor. He was also the first person to receive a Bitcoin transaction from Satoshi himself.

In third place is Blockstream CEO Adam Back, one of the first two individuals to receive an email from Satoshi Nakamoto. He also features in the trailer for the upcoming HBO documentary.

Who has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto?

From 2016 up until 2024, Australian computer scientist Craig Wright claimed that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. He made this claim after Wired magazine and Gizmodo suggested that he was Satoshi in a December 2015 article.

Since then, Wright has long proclaimed that he wrote the 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. He even won a libel case against crypto blogger Peter McCormack despite giving “deliberately false evidence.” The court awarded him £1 in damages

However, in March, Judge James Mellor ruled that the evidence proving Wright was not Satoshi was “overwhelming,” after the Crypto Open Patent Alliance initiated a legal battle to prevent Wright from suing Bitcoin developers. After a rigorous two-month trial, the U.K. High Court officially ruled that Craig Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto and that he is not the author of Bitcoin’s whitepaper.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Crypto and the Kafkaesque | Opinion

In this week’s #hearsay column, Dorian Batycka marks the 100-year anniversary of the Bohemian writer Franz Kafka’s death on June 3, 1924, taking you on a literary journey through the most “Kafkaesque” moments in all of crypto.

Imagine a world where you are ensnared in a web of bewildering and illogical situations, powerless against faceless bureaucracies that wield omnipotent and indifferent authority. This nightmarish distortion of reality is the essence of the term “Kafkaesque,” derived from the German-speaking Bohemian writer Franz Kafka. Through seminal works like The Trial (1914), The Castle (1922), and The Metamorphosis (1912), Kafka’s narratives have become foundational texts in modern literature, depicting protagonists trapped in existential anxiety and futility. Strikingly, these Kafkaesque themes find resonance in the chaotic and often dystopian world of cryptocurrency, where the promise of financial liberation is fortuitously often overshadowed by paradox and disillusionment.

Wojak, crypto, and the Kafkaesque

Franz Kafka wrote A Hunger Artist in 1922 and published it in 1924, the same year he passed away from a brutal condition that made him die of starvation due to complications from laryngeal tuberculosis. Kafka’s final story centers on a professional hunger artist who fasts for extended periods as a form of art, attracting audiences fascinated by his self-imposed suffering. Despite such dedication, the hunger artist becomes increasingly marginalized and forgotten as public interest wanes, leading to his eventual demise.

It’s a situation that mirrors the experience of crypto’s most titular figure: the wojak. The proverbial McDonald’s night manager whose incessant pursuit of quick wealth becomes an unhealthy obsession, akin to gambling. With wojak consumed by the volatile and often isolating and crippling failure of crypto trading and investment, he finds himself constantly in profound loss and disillusionment. What hunger was to Kafka’s artist, cheap packets of ramen noodles are to the toiling wage cuck hoping to get rich on a Solana meme coin. What could be more utterly Kafkaesque?

Satoshi Nakamoto as Joseph K.

Self-revelations aside, let’s shift gears to conjure the term “Kafkaesque” not with the wojak loser, but with the OG of crypto himself, Satoshi Nakamoto. In Kafka’s The Castle (1922), the protagonist K. struggles against an opaque and inaccessible bureaucratic authority; similar to Satoshi himself, Kafka speculates on the often duplicitous nature of governments, remarking: “You mustn’t believe everything that officials say,” adding, “I have my rights, and I shall get them.”

In The Trial, Kafka describes the arrest of the main character. “Someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K., he knew he had done nothing wrong but, one morning, he was arrested.” Again, one is here confronted with the brutal reality of a system bearing consequences on someone born to change it, i.e., Satoshi, or even CZ, for that matter. The lack of current regulatory clarity in crypto, from legislation being proposed in the EU, MiCA, has only created widespread confusion on the continent, through to the befuddling situation around legislation in the United States, where things have not fared much better, with both Joe Biden and Donald Trump also recently U-turning on the crypto bandwagon.

KafkaCrypto: towards a new theory of technology and doomer

Lastly, think about the idea of paradox itself, perhaps the pinnacle of all Kafkaesque situations. It’s based on a supposition that two seemingly different realities can be true at once. While cryptocurrency was designed to circumvent traditional financial systems and their regulatory frameworks, as the market has grown, so too has the demand for regulation to prevent fraud, protect consumers, and ensure market stability, often under the guise of anti-money laundering (AML) initiatives that exist in stark contrast to privacy-focused tools like Monero or Tornado Cash.

Yet, on top of this reality, a paradoxical situation has emerged: where the decentralized crypto world ethos has increasingly brushed up against the centralized systems that crypto purported to disrupt. Look no further than China’s or Russia’s recently stated that they would embrace central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Together with omnipresent state surveillance and control, the paradoxical reality of having crypto in the hands of a tyrannical government, while at the same time allowing for encrypted financial freedom, is indeed peak Kafkaesque.

“It’s only because of their stupidity that they’re able to be so sure of themselves,” Kafka concluded in The Trial, perhaps his most seminal work on the illusory nature of justice. It is perhaps in some ways related to the notion of effective altruism prevalent in modern echelons of crypto theory, and famously core to the convinced fraudster Sam Bankman Fried’s worldview, i.e., scamming for the greater good theory of crypto capitalism.

At its heart, cryptocurrency advocates for financial autonomy and individual control over one’s economic identity. Yet, as we mark the centennial since Kafka’s death, it’s clear that the crypto industry has taken on many Kafkaesque qualities. From the mysterious figure of Satoshi Nakamoto to the lowly wojak, through to the unsettling reality of crypto scams and the paradox of decentralization and regulation, the illusory sense of autonomy stands as a remarkable bellweather to how deeply problematic crypto has and continues to be. As Kafka once wrote:

“Every revolution evaporates and leaves behind only the slime of a new bureaucracy.”

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Đề xuất của OP_CAT nhằm đưa hợp đồng thông minh vào Bitcoin cuối cùng cũng nhận được 'số BIP'

Điều này đánh dấu bước đầu tiên hướng tới việc giới thiệu lại chức năng đã bị người sáng tạo Satoshi Nakamoto loại bỏ khỏi Bitcoin vào năm 2010.

Một nỗ lực nghiêm túc nhằm đưa chức năng hợp đồng thông minh giống Ethereum vào Bitcoin có tên OP_CAT cuối cùng đã được cấp “số BIP:” 347 . Đây là bước đầu tiên để thực sự tung ra bản nâng cấp phần mềm đã được đề xuất từ lâu.

Ethan Heilman, một trong những đồng tác giả của đề xuất cùng với Armin Sabouri, cho biết trong một cuộc phỏng vấn: “Việc nhận được số BIP không báo hiệu bất kỳ sự đồng thuận nào từ phía cộng đồng”. đề xuất dễ dàng hơn vì đề xuất hiện có mã định danh bằng số duy nhất mà mọi người đều đồng ý.”

Nói cách khác, việc được chỉ định BIP 347 có nghĩa là cuộc tranh luận về đề xuất gây tranh cãi cuối cùng cũng có thể bắt đầu một cách nghiêm túc.

Một bên là những người muốn dự trữ mạng Bitcoin chỉ cho các giao dịch tiền tệ; mặt khác là những người muốn xây dựng những thứ mới trên chuỗi, trong đó những người đề xuất OP_CAT chỉ là một phần nhỏ.

OP_CAT có lịch sử lâu đời trong giới Bitcoin . Ban đầu được đưa vào như một trong những op_code đầu tiên (về cơ bản là các phím tắt lập trình được tích hợp trong Bitcoin), chính Satoshi Nakamoto đã loại bỏ chức năng này vào năm 2010 sau khi có lo ngại về việc sử dụng quá nhiều bộ nhớ và khả năng gây ra các lỗ hổng bảo mật.

Nhưng trong những năm gần đây, đặc biệt là sau khi phát hành giao thức Ordinals nhằm khơi dậy mong muốn xây dựng trên chuỗi của các nhà phát triển, những người đề xuất đã quay trở lại OP_CAT như một cách khả thi để tăng số lượng thứ có thể được xây dựng bằng Bitcoin. Các đề xuất khác bao gồm những thứ như CTV của nhà phát triển Bitcoin Jeremy Rubin và các giải pháp mở rộng quy mô giàu tính năng như Stacks và Ark.

Heilman và Sabouri bắt đầu nghiên cứu giới thiệu lại OP_CAT vào năm 2022 và lần đầu tiên đề xuất tung ra nó một năm sau đó trên Danh sách gửi thư Bitcoin thông qua một soft fork tương thích ngược. Ý tưởng là xác định lại và mở rộng dựa trên mã hiện có có tên “OP_SUCCESS126” mà không cần phải phân nhánh cứng chuỗi.

Nếu đề xuất được thông qua, các giao ước OP_CAT có thể cho phép tạo ra các ứng dụng phức tạp hơn và thiết lập đa chữ ký trên Bitcoin. Nó hoạt động bằng cách đưa ra “các giao ước” hoặc các quy tắc có thể được thiết lập để xác định cách thức hoạt động của một giao dịch cụ thể đối với Bitcoin.

“Bitcoin cho phép người dùng đặt ra các quy tắc về ai và làm thế nào bitcoin của họ có thể được chi tiêu. Tất cả những gì CAT làm là nó kết hợp hai giá trị lại với nhau. Vì vậy, nếu bạn có ‘abc’ và ‘def,’ CAT sẽ kết hợp hai giá trị này lại với nhau để tạo thành ‘abcdef’,” Heilman nói và nói thêm rằng ngày nay thao tác cơ bản như vậy là không thể thực hiện được. “CAT chỉ là cách viết tắt của conCATenate.”

“Sau khi cộng đồng tin tưởng rằng phần mềm hoạt động như thiết kế, chúng tôi sẽ tiến hành PR vào bitcoin-core. Đây là nơi niềm vui thực sự bắt đầu vì câu hỏi thay đổi từ ‘phần mềm có đúng không?’ tới ‘cộng đồng Bitcoin có muốn OP_CAT không?’,” Heilman nói. “Đây có thể là một quá trình nhanh chóng hoặc có thể mất nhiều năm.”

Trong số những người ủng hộ OP_CAT lớn nhất có những người đồng sáng lập dự án Taproot Wizards nổi tiếng của Ordinals, Eric Wall và Udi Wertheimer, những người đã tạo ra dự án khắc chữ Quantum Cats như một loại chiến dịch tiếp thị cho đề xuất của Heilman và Sabouri.

Mặc dù Mèo lượng tử là một trong những dự án khắc chữ phổ biến nhất cho đến nay, nhưng bản thân OP_CAT vẫn chưa được chấp nhận rộng rãi. Chẳng hạn, có một số suy đoán rằng mặc dù Heilman và Sabouri đã gửi đề xuất BIP của họ vài tháng trước, nhưng nó đã bị biên tập viên BIP duy nhất và nhà phát triển Bitcoin Core Luke Dashjr từ chối chấp thuận, người không đơn độc hoài nghi về những diễn biến gần đây. thí nghiệm dây chuyền

Vào thứ Hai, cộng đồng Bitcoin đã nêu tên thêm năm biên tập viên BIP. Theo GitHub, số BIP của OP_CAT được chỉ định bởi một biên tập viên có tên “Roasbeef”.

Heilman nói rằng bây giờ OP_CAT đã có số BIP, cộng đồng sẽ quyết định liệu nó có nên tiếp tục hay không.

“Chỉ nói về bản thân mình, tại thời điểm này, tôi dự định loại mình khỏi quy trình và để cộng đồng tranh luận xem OP_CAT có phải là điều họ muốn hay không,” anh nói. “Tôi không có ý định tham gia cuộc tranh luận đó trừ khi cần thiết.” làm rõ các vấn đề kỹ thuật.”

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Coindesk