Lưu trữ cho từ khóa: elections

Is Trump just using crypto voters? Harris isn’t so innocent either

Trump’s crypto plans sound perfect on paper — but what’s the catch? Could Harris’ understated approach hold the key to a safer, smarter crypto future?

As the 2024 U.S. presidential race enters its final stages, both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are ramping up efforts to woo a growing but often overlooked group of voters — crypto voters.

Trump, with his newly launched World Liberty Financial (WLF) token and plans for a “Bitcoin (BTC) and Crypto Advisory Council,” has positioned himself as a vocal supporter of crypto and decentralized finance.

On the other hand, Vice President Harris has quietly begun outlining policies aimed at protecting crypto investors, particularly in Black communities, through her Opportunity Agenda.

Let’s dive deeper into what Trump and Harris are offering to the crypto community, how their policies stack up, and what it means for voters who are hoping to see clearer regulations—and maybe a little more digital coin in their pockets.

Trump’s crypto courtship

Donald Trump has transformed his stance on crypto in a way that speaks directly to a key group of voters, a calculated move to tap into the rising influence of the crypto community in America.

It all started in May when Trump’s campaign began accepting crypto donations, a notable change from his earlier skeptical views. This was followed by several strategic moves aimed at convincing the crypto community that he’s their candidate.

By June, Trump publicly threw his support behind Bitcoin miners, expressing his hope that the remaining Bitcoin would be mined “right here in America” – a key message for those concerned about the exodus of mining operations to countries like Russia and Kazakhstan.

But Trump didn’t stop there. His appearance at the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville at the end of July marked a crucial moment in his crypto campaign.

Standing before a packed room of crypto advocates, Trump not only promised to establish a national Bitcoin reserve if elected—an unprecedented move—but he also vowed to fire SEC Chairman Gary Gensler.

This promise, met with a standing ovation, struck a chord with crypto voters, many of whom see Gensler as an obstacle to the industry’s growth due to his firm stance on regulating digital assets like stocks and bonds.

The creation of a national Bitcoin reserve, paired with his pledge to form a Bitcoin and Crypto Advisory Council, set him apart from his opponents, especially in a political arena where other candidates have remained cautious on crypto.

Beyond policy promises, Trump has also made highly visible gestures to show his support for crypto. During a campaign stop at Pubkey, a Bitcoin-themed bar in New York, Trump became the first former U.S. president to use cryptocurrency in a transaction, buying a dozen burgers using Bitcoin.

At the center of Trump’s crypto efforts lies his personal project, WLF, a DeFi platform launched in September 2024. Marketed as a crypto bank where users can borrow, lend, and invest, WLF is clearly designed to lure crypto voters by offering them something tangible.

The platform’s native token, WLFI, was introduced with much fanfare, aiming to raise $300 million at a valuation of $1.5 billion. Yet, the project has struggled to meet its ambitious goals, with only $12.9 million raised so far.

More controversial is the token allocation—Trump and his family are poised to receive 75% of the net protocol revenue, raising questions about transparency and how much of the project is for the benefit of its users versus the Trump family.

WLF claims to be apolitical, yet the timing and Trump’s heavy involvement make it clear that this is as much a political play as it is a financial one. The project’s roadmap includes bold promises, but its slow progress and the outsized financial benefits for the Trump family have sparked skepticism.

Still, Trump’s supporters view the project as part of his broader narrative of financial independence and American economic strength, tied neatly to his political messaging.

Harris’s cautious approach to crypto

While Trump has taken an aggressive and hands-on approach to wooing the crypto community, Kamala Harris has chosen a more measured path.

Harris, the current Vice President, has not made crypto a centerpiece of her campaign, but recent moves suggest she is aware of the growing importance of digital assets and their impact on voters.

The first real signs of Harris’ approach came during a roundtable event at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where her senior campaign adviser, Brian Nelson, shed some light on her potential policies.

Nelson made it clear that Harris intends to support policies that allow emerging technologies like crypto to grow while ensuring they are adequately regulated. Though the message was vague, it marked the first public stance from Harris’ camp on the matter.

This careful dance became more apparent when Harris recently introduced her “Opportunity Agenda”, a broader economic plan aimed at improving financial inclusion.

One key aspect of this agenda is the protection of crypto investors, particularly Black Americans, a demographic where over 20% own or have owned digital assets.

Harris has promised to build a regulatory framework to ensure that the benefits of crypto can be enjoyed safely without the risks of fraud, volatility, or market manipulation.

However, while Harris has started laying out her views on paper, her direct engagement with the crypto community has been rocky at best.

A virtual town hall hosted by the ‘Crypto For Harris’ campaign was supposed to be a moment to rally support from the digital asset space, but the event fell flat.

Lacking interaction and with Harris herself notably absent, the town hall left prominent figures like Tyler Winklevoss and Jake Brukhman frustrated.

Winklevoss went as far as to call it a “clown show,” while Brukhman criticized the format for failing to capture the essence of a town hall—engagement and dialogue.

The event, instead, relied on pre-recorded speeches from political allies like Senators Gillibrand and Schiff, making it feel more like a lecture than a conversation.

Despite the misstep, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a major Democratic figure, did his best to fill the gap, emerging as a surprise ally for crypto. Schumer promised that crypto is “here to stay no matter what” and pledged to push for sensible regulation before the end of the year.

Interestingly, Harris’ campaign has also received quiet support from notable crypto figures. Chris Larsen, the co-founder of Ripple (XRP), has donated over $1 million in XRP to Harris’ campaign, expressing confidence that she would bring a “more pragmatic approach and clear rules” to the crypto industry — something he believes is missing under the current administration led by SEC Chairman Gensler.

While Harris hasn’t gone as far as Trump in embracing crypto, she’s also made subtle moves to distance herself from the more anti-crypto voices within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Her cautious approach might not generate standing ovations like Trump’s promises to fire Gensler or create a Bitcoin reserve, but it offers a path for crypto that leans toward stability and investor protection — appealing to voters who seek progress without the chaos.

What are the odds?

As the 2024 presidential race intensifies, the odds of each candidate winning have shifted dramatically in the past few days, and the crypto market’s bullish sentiment might be playing a role.

According to a popular betting contest on Polymarket, which has attracted over $2.06 billion in bets, Trump currently holds a 60.1% chance of victory, compared to Harris’ 39.8%.

This is a stark contrast to just a few weeks ago when the two were neck and neck at nearly 50% each. In fact, in mid-September, Harris was leading with a 52% edge over Trump’s 46%.

A lot has changed in the past few days, particularly in the crypto market. The newfound bullishness in digital assets, particularly Bitcoin, seems to be influencing voter sentiment.

As of Oct. 18, Bitcoin is trading just shy of $70,000, hovering around $68,700, its highest levels in months, reflecting the growing impact of the crypto market on political outcomes.

As we head closer to Election Day, the tides could shift again, depending on the performance of the crypto market and any last-minute developments from both campaigns. The coming days will be critical in defining both the race and the future of crypto policy in the U.S.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Will Trump’s SEC pick be crypto’s savior? All eyes on Dan Gallagher

Is the SEC about to get a crypto-friendly makeover with Dan Gallagher at the helm? How would his approach differ from Gensler’s crackdown?

Crypto’s Robinhood in the making?

Rumors are swirling that Dan Gallagher, Robinhood‘s Chief Legal Officer and a former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission commissioner, may be tapped to lead the SEC if Donald Trump wins the 2024 election.

Gallagher’s name emerges at a time when tensions between the SEC and the crypto industry are already at an all-time high. Under the leadership of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the SEC has been cracking down on crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance, arguing that many cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities.

Moreover, in recent months, Robinhood’s crypto division has found itself in the SEC’s crosshairs, receiving a Wells Notice in May — an indicator that charges could be forthcoming.

Not just Robinhood, but OpenSea, the largest non-fungible tokens marketplace, also received a Wells Notice from the SEC in August, alleging that certain NFTs on the platform may be classified as securities — a claim that could have serious repercussions for the entire NFT space.

Meanwhile, the crypto industry argues that the current SEC framework doesn’t fit digital assets, creating a regulatory headache for companies trying to comply.

If Gallagher does step into the chair position, his background in both traditional finance and digital assets could offer a new approach to regulating the evolving crypto market.

But what exactly does this mean for the future of the industry? Let’s dive deeper into what a Gallagher-led SEC might look like and how it could shape the crypto space.

Who is Dan Gallagher?

Dan Gallagher’s career in financial regulation is both extensive and diverse, making him a compelling candidate for the SEC chair position, should Donald Trump return to office.

Gallagher has held various key roles that have shaped his approach to securities law, market regulation, and, more recently, the crypto industry.

He first gained recognition as a Republican SEC commissioner from 2011 to 2015, where he advocated for a regulatory environment that balanced oversight and innovation.

His time at the SEC coincided with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, a sweeping piece of legislation aimed at reforming the financial system following the 2008 crisis. 

While Gallagher supported certain aspects of the law, he often voiced concerns about overregulation, criticizing how excessive rules could hinder market growth and innovation, particularly for smaller firms.

Before his time as commissioner, Gallagher had already accumulated considerable experience within the SEC. He worked as counsel to SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins, which exposed him to critical regulatory issues, including enforcement actions and market structure.

In 2020, Gallagher joined Robinhood as Chief Legal Officer, a move that thrust him into the spotlight once again, particularly as Robinhood rapidly expanded its role in both traditional finance and crypto markets.

His tenure at Robinhood has not been without controversy. In early 2021, Robinhood faced intense public scrutiny during the GameStop short squeeze when the platform temporarily halted trading of certain stocks. 

This move led to allegations of market manipulation and calls for regulatory investigations. Although Gallagher wasn’t directly responsible for the decision, his role as legal chief required him to manage the legal and reputational fallout.

What to expect from a Gallagher led SEC?

Dan Gallagher’s public statements and tweets reveal much about his views on the intersection of regulation, innovation, and government oversight in both crypto and broader financial markets.

Gallagher has consistently criticized what he sees as the SEC’s failure to establish a clear and workable regulatory framework for digital assets, often pointing to the agency’s reliance on enforcement actions rather than setting clear rules.

In response to a May 2024 tweet about the FIT21 Act, Gallagher critiqued the SEC, stating, “The SEC is clearly not going to step in and provide a working regulatory framework for crypto. I’m happy to see Congress filling the void.”

The FIT21 Act, which passed the House despite opposition from President Biden and current SEC Chair Gensler, aims to delineate responsibilities between the SEC and the CFTC, with the goal of offering regulatory clarity and consumer protections.

Gallagher’s vocal support for the legislation suggests that, under his leadership, the SEC could be more open to collaborating with Congress to develop comprehensive rules for digital assets—rules that don’t rely solely on enforcement but instead provide businesses with a clear path to compliance.

One of the most critical aspects of this potential shift could be how crypto firms are regulated. Gallagher has advocated for the idea that the existing regulatory framework, designed for traditional financial institutions, doesn’t suit the decentralized and fast-evolving nature of crypto assets.

This suggests that a Gallagher-led SEC would push for clearer distinctions between digital assets that qualify as securities and those that fall under the CFTC’s purview, such as commodities. The current ambiguity has left companies facing legal uncertainty, and Gallagher’s approach would likely aim to eliminate this confusion.

Gallagher’s tweets also offer insight into his broader regulatory philosophy. In December 2023, he criticized the SEC’s new “predictive data analytics” proposal, calling it “unreasonably broad and burdensome.” He warned that such rules would lead to “higher costs and less technology and access for investors.”

His stance suggests that, if he were to lead the SEC, he would advocate for a more hands-off approach to regulating emerging technologies, especially those that improve market access and efficiency.

However, while his vision for a more innovation-friendly regulatory environment may resonate with industry players, it could face opposition from consumer advocacy groups or those pushing for stricter oversight of digital assets.

The game of odds

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the odds of Donald Trump returning to the White House are gaining momentum. 

Data from Polymarket, a popular prediction platform, shows Trump’s chances of reclaiming the presidency have risen to 52.8%, marking his largest lead over Democratic contender Kamala Harris since she entered the race. 

With over $1.46 billion in total bets placed on the election, Trump has attracted the lion’s share of betting volume, raking in $366 million compared to Harris’ $285 million.

Trump’s recent surge in the polls, particularly after his October rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, has bolstered speculation about what his return to power could mean for various industries, including the crypto space. 

During the rally, Trump stopped short of making any direct promises regarding cryptocurrency, but he did hint at revisiting the case of Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road.

If Trump returns to the White House, the SEC is likely to experience a leadership shakeup, with Gary Gensler possibly being replaced by a new face — Dan Gallagher.

Gallagher’s appointment would likely lead to clearer rules for crypto, and a friendlier environment for digital asset companies to thrive. 

But as with anything in both politics and markets, nothing is set in stone. The upcoming election remains a tight race, and the future of the SEC — and by extension, the future of crypto regulation—hinges on who will sit in the Oval Office come 2025.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Trump’s crypto embrace is winning him votes, poll shows

A recent Fairleigh Dickinson University poll found that former President Donald Trump’s outreach to crypto owners is paying off this 2024 U.S. Presidential election season.

It appears Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency is paying off. The FDU poll revealed that Trump holds a significant lead among voters who own crypto or related assets, outpacing Vice President Kamala Harris by 12 percentage points in the 2024 U.S. Presidential race. 

The poll shows that 50% of likely voters who own crypto backed Trump, compared to 38% who support Harris. Conversely, among non-crypto owners, Harris leads by 12 points, garnering 53% support to Trump’s 41%.

The FDU Poll also revealed that 15% of all registered voters in the U.S. have owned crypto, NFTs, or similar digital products. This group is disproportionately composed of men, younger voters, and members of racial minority groups. 

Interestingly, while Republicans are slightly more likely to own crypto than Democrats, the difference does not fully account for the 24-point swing in presidential support between crypto owners and non-owners, according to the poll.

Crypto in the driver’s seat this election season

During this election season, both parties have catered to the crypto crowd, aiming to appeal to the crypto community and its financial contributions. The support among crypto owners indicates the increasing influence of digital assets in American politics.

“Trump has been reaching out to the crypto community, and it seems to have paid off. It might be easy to dismiss them as insignificant, but I don’t think people realize exactly how widespread crypto ownership is.”

Executive Director of the poll Professor Dan Cassino.

Trump has not shied away from expressing a pro-crypto sentiment during his most recent campaign trail. Trump’s stance on crypto is in stark contrast to his earlier criticism, in which he famously labeled cryptocurrencies a “scam” in a 2021 interview.

However, during this election cycle, Trump said he would embrace crypto in his next presidential term. “Crypto is moving out of the U.S. because of hostility toward it. I don’t want that. If we are going to embrace it, we will have to let them be here,” he said in a recent rally.

Trump’s strategy to court the cryptocurrency community has been evident in recent months. In July, he delivered a keynote address at Bitcoin2024 in Nashville, where he expressed strong support for the Bitcoin (BTC) mining industry despite concerns about its environmental impact. 

On Aug. 29, Trump announced plans to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the planet” if re-elected, hinting at an initiative led by his sons called World Liberty Financial. While details are limited, the project reportedly focuses on real-world asset tokenization.

On May 21, The Trump campaign introduced a fundraising page that accepts donations in any cryptocurrency available on the Coinbase platform.

On the other side of the aisle, Democrats, led by Harris’s campaign team, launched the Crypto4Harris initiative in early August to engage with the crypto community and counter Republican efforts to attract crypto voters. The campaign aims to develop a pro-crypto policy framework to repair Harris’s relationship with the crypto industry.

As the 2024 Presidential election approaches, Trump’s crypto support may be crucial in swaying undecided voters, particularly among demographics that have traditionally leaned toward the Democratic Party.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Only 0.0028% of Americans would qualify for the unrealized capital gains tax that had Crypto Twitter up in arms this week

Recent rumors swirling on X wrongly accused presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ of endorsing President Biden’s 2025 proposal for a 25% tax that includes unrealized capital gains. What’s the truth behind the headlines and what caused the confusion?

Earlier this week, thousands of crypto investors found themselves caught up in a whirlwind of misinformation, with many prominent accounts reporting that U.S. presidential candidate Kamala Harris had endorsed a new tax on unrealized gains, originally proposed by President Joe Biden for 2025.

Social media, especially X, buzzed with outrage as people retweeted and reacted to evidently misinterpreted headlines, convinced that Harris wanted to tax unrealized capital gains at 25% next year. The mass disapproval expressed on X seemed to imply that members of the crypto community thought this proposed tax would be all U.S. investors, regardless of their net worth.

Unrealized gains refer to the amount an asset has gained in value (let’s say in USD) before you sell the asset and take the profit. So if you bought Bitcoin at $50,000 and now you’re seeing your BTC has grown more than 22% at today’s prices, you don’t actually realize those gains until you sell your BTC.

The outcry was evidently fueled by a misunderstanding after Harris’ campaign team last week released her economic plan, as well as stated on Monday that, if elected, she would raise the corporate tax rate — a proposal previously put forward by the Biden administration.

Many were quick to assume that Harris’ team had officially endorsed the current administration’s entire tax policy proposal for 2025, which mentions unrealized gains as part of a new minimum tax on the ultra wealthy.

But as happens with rapidly spreading rumors, this just wasn’t true. 

As pointed out by crypto investor, professor and well-known analyst on X, Harris’ team did not endorse, comment on or otherwise reference the 256-page document entitled “General Explanations
of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2025 Revenue Proposals,” which was published in March of this year.

However, someone on X had read at least part of the extensive proposal from Biden-Harris administration. Included in the document is a new minimum tax of 25% on total income (including unrealized capital gains) for people with more than $100 million in wealth:

“The proposal would impose a minimum tax of 25 percent on total income, generally inclusive of
unrealized capital gains, for all taxpayers with wealth (that is, the difference obtained by
subtracting liabilities from assets) greater than $100 million.”

Biden’s tax proposal for 2025

Taken out of context — both that this is a proposal from the current administration and it is only applicable to a very limited group of highly wealthy individuals, and also that Harris and her team didn’t even endorse this proposal — the rumors took on a life of their own and spread across the crypto community.

Let’s break down what we do know about Harris’ proposed tax policy, how it might impact the crypto market, and what experts have to say about it.

Decoding Harris’ taxation proposal and its impact on crypto

Last week, Harris did in fact reveal part of her proposed economic agenda, which included a series of tax proposals. While the details are still emerging, let’s break down what we know so far.

First, as noted above, Harris has expressed support for raising the corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%. This move is expected to generate significant revenue for the federal government, potentially increasing tax receipts by up to $1.4 trillion over the next decade.

This proposed increase in the corporate tax rate could impact crypto companies, especially larger entities like exchanges or mining operations. 

Higher taxes could lead to reduced investment in new projects or increased fees for users as companies seek to cover their rising tax obligations.

Another key aspect of Harris’s economic agenda is focused on making housing more affordable. She’s proposing several tax incentives to encourage the construction of new homes, particularly for first-time buyers and renters.

For instance, she plans to offer tax breaks to companies that build affordable housing and provide up to $25,000 in down-payment support for new homeowners to address the rising costs of housing in the U.S.

While the question of tokenized real estate could come into play here, it’s not clear that the housing-related policy proposals affect crypto holders in any particular way.

What is Biden’s proposal for capital gains tax?

Again, the confusion surrounding Harris’ rumored (but actually fake news) endorsement of Biden’s proposed tax on unrealized capital gains stems from a couple of misunderstandings. But even though Harris did not endorse the plan, it’s not unreasonable to suggest she might do so in the future. So let’s take a look at what Biden’s plan for 2025 tax policy actually entails.

In general, Biden’s proposal includes several tax policy changes aimed at increasing the tax burden on the wealthiest Americans. The proposal argues that current long-term capital gains tax policy in particular disproportionally benefits the very wealthy:

“Preferential tax rates on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends disproportionately
benefit high-income taxpayers and provide many high-income taxpayers with a lower tax rate
than many low- and middle-income taxpayers.”

The proposal seeks to close the so-called “loophole” in the current system that let’s wealthier individuals pass on the appreciated value of their assets to their beneficiaries without ever paying income tax on those gains.

Currently, long-term capital gains — profits from the sale of assets held for more than a year — are taxed at a maximum rate of 20%, or 23.8% when including the 3.8% net investment income tax, with a few exceptions.

For high-income earners with taxable income exceeding $1 million, Biden’s proposal would tax long-term capital gains at ordinary income tax rates, which could reach as high as 37%, or 40.8% with the NIIT.

However, this is not the end of the story. Another proposal within the budget seeks to increase the NIIT by 1.2% points for those earning over $400,000, bringing the total NIIT to 5%. 

This combination would effectively push the maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6% for the wealthy.

To break it down: this 44.6% rate is the result of combining the proposed 39.6% top ordinary income tax rate with the increased 5% NIIT (which includes the additional 1.2% hike for high earners). 

What about unrealized gains?

The highly controversial phrase “unrealized capital games” is included in Biden’s 2025 proposal as part of a minimum income tax (25%) for the wealthiest Americans who have wealth (meaning assets minus liabilities) of over $100 million. This minimum tax for the”extremely wealthy”, as previously noted, would include unrealized capital gains and reportedly represents an effort to address the loophole in the current system.

But how many Americans would even be affected by such a change in tax policy? The answer is less than 10,000. According to a 2024 U.S. wealth report published in March, there are currently 9,850 individuals in the U.S. who qualify as “centi-millionaires” — aka have wealth of $100 million or more.

That means, to clarify, that the conversation that took X by storm earlier this week was actually about a tax proposal that would affect just 0.0028% of the U.S. population — and that the current Democratic candidate for president hasn’t even endorsed.

U.S. wealth report for 2024 | Source: Henley & Partners

For most crypto traders and investors, of course, the widely discussed and criticized tax proposal would most likely be irrelevant.

Public reaction and controversy 

The recent debate around Vice President Harris and her (rumored) stance on taxing unrealized capital gains ignited a firestorm on social media. 

Reports suggest that Harris is aligned with the Biden administrations 2025 tax proposals, but Harris and her team have yet to endorse all of the proposed changes officially.

Notably, a January 2024 analysis by Americans for Tax Fairness revealed that U.S. billionaires and centi-millionaires held a staggering $8.5 trillion in unrealized capital gains in 2022, which could be a potential goldmine for federal revenue, but, clearly, has also sparked intense debate.

Certified financial planner and CNBC advisor council member Douglas A. Boneparth went for a direct attack, calling the idea of taxing unrealized gains “dumb.”

Aaron Levie, CEO of Box, shares the same belief, stating that “unrealized gains are simply a field in a database and not useful until converted into something of value.”

Interestingly, according to Polymarket, while Harris was once leading the race with strong odds of winning the election, her chances have recently dipped to 46%. Meanwhile, Trump, who was slightly behind, has retaken the front seat with odds now at 53%.

2024 U.S. presidential election winner bets on Polymarket | Source: Polymarket

In the end, whether you view the idea as a necessary step toward equity or as simply “a field in a database,” one thing’s for sure — when it comes to tax policy, the devil is in the details. And if social media has taught us anything, it’s that even the smallest detail can cause a big stir.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

LayerZero, Mog Coin, and Bonk prices are rising: beware of key risks

It was a sea of green on Monday as Bitcoin bounced back above $63,000 as investors embraced a risk-on sentiment. 

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) was one of the best-performing altcoins on Monday as focus shifted to the upcoming ENSv2 upgrade. LayerZero, which recently launched its airdrop, rose to $3.6, 40% above its lowest level last week.

Mog Coin, one of the best-performing meme coins this year, rose to an all-time high of $0.0000021, up more than 200% above its lowest level in June. Bonk has also risen by over 32% from its last month’s lowest point, which made it our chart of the week. Some of the other top-performers were altcoins like Dogwifhat (WIF), Immutable X (IMX), Fantom (FTM), and Bittensor (TAO).

MOG vs ZRO vs Bonk prices chart

Bitcoin and altcoins’ recovery happened in a high-volume environment. Data by CoinMarketCap shows that the daily volume jumped by over 45% to $53 billion, its highest point since June 28th.

There was no major catalyst to justify the rally. Therefore, the likely reason why these coins gained is that investors have embraced a risk-on sentiment after the French election held on Sunday. While Marine Le Pen’s party won the election, the victory was lower than what polls were expecting. 

In the aftermath, the US dollar index (DXY) dropped by 15 basis points while global stocks jumped. The French CAC 40 index rose by over 2% while the German DAX index rose by 0.70%. In the US, futures tied to the Dow Jones and Nasdaq 100 index were also in the green.

Dead cat bounce?

Bitcoin price chart

Still, there is a risk that the LayerZero, Mog Coin, and Bonk price rally is a dead cat bounce, a scenario where an asset in a freefall stages a brief comeback only to resume a downtrend. 

This risk is magnified by the fact that Bitcoin has formed several risky patterns in the past few months. It formed a double-top pattern at $72,000 last month. It has also failed to move above that level since March 27th. 

Bitcoin has also remained below the 50-day and 100-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMA), meaning that bears are still in control. Most recently, it has formed a bearish pennant chart pattern.

Therefore, there is a risk that Bitcoin will drop and move below $60,000 this week. If this happens, altcoins like MOG, BONK, and ZRO will resume their bearish trend since in most cases, these tokens follow Bitcoin’s price action.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News