Lưu trữ cho từ khóa: Regulation

Can global regulation keep up with the tokenization boom? | Opinion

Imagine a world where everyday investors can own a part of underground oil reserves or a share in a skyscraper with the click of a button. This is the promise of tokenizing real-world assets—a technology poised to unlock trillions of dollars in traditionally illiquid markets like real estate, commodities, and infrastructure. However, while this innovation is set to revolutionize global finance, the regulatory frameworks needed to support it are often being outpaced by the rapid developments in this space.

Security tokens, such as those representing RWAs like property, commodities, or oil and gas, have the potential to transform how we invest, but they also come with strict regulations that need to be followed.

The growing market for tokenized assets

According to the Boston Consulting Group and World Economic Forum, the tokenized asset market is expected to reach 16 trillion by 2030. Another report suggested that the market value for tokenized assets could soar up to $10 trillion in a ‘bull case’ scenario or $3.5 trillion in the ‘bear case’ by 2030. This projection covers a wide range of real-world assets, from real estate to commodities like oil and gas, and demonstrates the growing appetite for fractional ownership models that allow everyday investors to participate in markets that were previously the domain of institutional players​.

Yet, for all its promise, the road to tokenizing these assets is paved with regulatory hurdles.

The challenges of fragmented regulations

Specifically, one of the primary challenges facing tokenization today is the fragmented nature of regulatory frameworks across different jurisdictions. While some countries, such as Liechtenstein and Switzerland, have developed clear regulatory structures for security tokens, many other key markets remain ambiguous or lag behind in defining how tokenized assets fit into existing securities laws.

For instance, the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, set to roll out fully by 2024, provides some clarity on how certain digital assets, including tokenized securities, should be regulated across the bloc. This kind of regulatory framework is crucial for establishing investor confidence and ensuring that these new financial instruments adhere to established legal norms. However, MiCA’s approach, while promising, is still limited geographically, and global markets remain fragmented​. Moreover, there is ongoing debate within the legal community about the interpretation and implementation of MiCA, particularly regarding its application to tokenized assets, underscoring the complexity of aligning regulatory frameworks with the rapid pace of innovation.

In other regions, regulatory ambiguity is more pronounced. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission has signaled that many tokenized assets fall under its jurisdiction as securities. However, a lack of definitive rulings on specific tokens has left many in legal limbo, unsure of whether they comply with US securities law. This uncertainty poses a significant challenge to global interoperability—an essential feature for the widespread adoption of tokenized assets.

The role of compliance and security

The regulatory uncertainty surrounding security tokens is not just an issue of compliance but also one of security. Blockchain technology promises greater transparency and security, with tokenized assets recorded on an immutable ledger that can be easily audited. However, these benefits hinge on ensuring that the platforms facilitating tokenization are compliant with anti-money laundering and know-your-customer regulations.

A key consideration for tokenization platforms is following financial rules set by local and global authorities. To do this, many platforms use private blockchain systems or permissioned blockchain models to track who is using them and prevent illegal activities like money laundering. However, the lack of standardization across jurisdictions creates significant friction for cross-border transactions, a key value proposition for the tokenization of global assets​.

Additionally, ensuring the security of the blockchain infrastructure and the underlying assets remains a top priority. The potential for hacking, fraud, or mismanagement of tokenized assets could undermine the credibility of this emerging market. For tokenization to gain traction, particularly among institutional investors, robust security measures, transparency and compliance are essential.

Opportunities for innovation in regulatory sandboxes

Despite these challenges, tokenization platforms are already finding success by collaborating with regulators in regulatory sandboxes—controlled environments where they can test innovative financial products. In places like Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland, regulatory sandboxes have provided a testing ground for blockchain projects, allowing developers to identify compliance issues before full market deployment. 

For instance, Switzerland’s SIX Digital Exchange has successfully issued tokenized bonds in a fully compliant manner, demonstrating how traditional securities can be brought onto the blockchain. In May 2024, SDX issued a CHF 200 million digital bond in collaboration with the World Bank, further showcasing how traditional securities can be brought onto the blockchain while adhering to regulatory standards. ​

In Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s regulatory sandbox has enabled projects like BondEvalue, which has tokenized government bonds, to test their platforms under regulatory supervision. In 2023, BondEvalue rebranded as BondbloX and expanded its platform, allowing bonds to be traded in smaller denominations and making bond investments more accessible to retail investors. These examples show that innovation and compliance can work hand-in-hand, laying the foundation for a more secure and accessible market for tokenized assets.

A path forward: Collaboration and global standards

Ultimately, the future of tokenizing real-world assets will depend on global collaboration between regulators, developers, and investors. Security tokens offer a tremendous opportunity to reshape how we view and access traditional assets, but this can only be realized if the regulatory landscape evolves in tandem with technological innovation.

A unified global regulatory framework may be the ideal, but in the short term, clearer guidelines from national regulators and further development of international standards like MiCA are essential. Moreover, establishing interoperability between blockchain platforms could ease cross-border compliance, enabling tokenization to reach its full potential in a decentralized global economy​.

For now, as both opportunities and challenges in tokenizing RWAs come into sharper focus, businesses must tread carefully. The winners in this space will be those who embrace both innovation and compliance, striking the right balance as the market continues to mature.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Kazakhstan proposes stricter controls for bank transfers to foreign crypto exchanges: report

Kazakhstan’s financial watchdog is set to implement new restrictions that would require banks to automatically deny banking transfers to overseas crypto exchanges.

The Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of Financial Market, which oversees the country’s financial sector, is considering new measures that would require banks to deny transfers to overseas crypto exchanges that have not registered with the local financial center.

According to a Wednesday report from Russian state-led news outlet TASS, in addition to transfer limits to crypto exchanges, the regulator’s draft also proposes restricting transactions involving online casinos and forbidding operators from accepting payments from individuals under 21 years of age.

The draft also suggests blocking transfers totaling no more than 100,000 tenge (around $205) per month when dealing with unregistered crypto exchanges. Additionally, banks will be required to conduct enhanced due diligence for any transactions exceeding $1,000, even with registered crypto exchanges.

Kazakhstan tightens regulation of crypto exchanges

Crypto exchanges in Kazakhstan are allowed to offer their services only when they operate within the financial center in Astana, which offers a special tax, currency, and visa regime. As of press time, the country has 10 regulated crypto exchanges, including Binance and Bybit.

Recently, Kazakhstan has increased its regulatory scrutiny of non-licensed crypto exchanges, freezing $1.2 million in crypto linked to nearly two dozen illegal over-the-counter platforms. As crypto.news reported earlier, Kazakhstan is targeting not only small exchangers but also major players. In December 2023, the country banned Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, over allegations of violations of local crypto regulations.

At the time, the Ministry of Information confirmed that access to Coinbase was restricted at the request of the Ministry of Digital Development due to the exchange’s trading activities, which were found to violate Kazakhstan’s Law on Digital Assets. The law prohibits the issuance and circulation of uninsured digital assets and the operation of exchanges trading such assets.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

EU markets regulator demands enhanced cybersecurity audits for crypto firms: report

The EU’s markets watchdog is reportedly set to call for mandatory external audits of crypto companies’ cyber defenses to enhance consumer protection amid rising security breaches.

The European Securities and Markets Authority is said to be gearing up to advocate for mandatory external audits of cyber defenses for crypto businesses as part of its broader effort to enhance consumer protection in the crypto space.

According to a Wednesday report from the Financial Times, which does not cite specific sources, ESMA is considering stricter cyber protection rules and urging European Union lawmakers to amend upcoming regulations to mandate third-party audits assessing the resilience of crypto firms against cyber attacks.

However, the European Commission “has pushed back against the move,” the report reads, adding that the commission is suggesting that ESMA’s proposals may exceed the intended scope of the legislation.

Cybersecurity has become a pressing issue for the crypto industry, with hackers stealing almost $1.4 billion, nearly doubling last year’s figures, per data from TRM Labs. Another blockchain forensic firm Chainalysis reported that the number of hacking incidents in 2024 has seen a modest increase of 2.8% compared to 2023. However, the average value lost per hack has surged by 79.5%, escalating from $5.9 million per incident in 2023 to $10.6 million in 2024, highlighting a growing concern as cybercriminals increasingly focus on centralized exchanges.

Under the upcoming Markets in Crypto-Assets framework, crypto firms will be required to secure licenses from European Union member states starting Dec. 31 and demonstrate robust controls against money laundering and other financial crimes. Some aspects of this regulatory framework have already begun to reshape the industry, with Coinbase recently announcing plans to remove non-compliant stablecoins from its European exchange by year-end.

Concerns about the regulations persist among industry leaders. Paolo Ardoino, CEO of Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer, cautioned that strict cash reserve requirements could create systemic risks for banks. The trend of delisting is not limited to stablecoins, as Kraken recently also announced plans to suspend trading for privacy-focused Monero (XMR) in the European Economic Area, following similar moves by Binance and OKX.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Binance, Indian police bust renewable energy scam, seize $100,000 in USDT

Binance and the Delhi Police have dismantled a $100,000 scam, which misled investors with false claims tied to India’s renewable energy initiatives.

Cryptocurrency exchange Binance has teamed up with Indian police to bust a sophisticated scam involving a fraudulent entity dubbed “M/s Goldcoat Solar.” The operation, which falsely claimed ties to India’s renewable energy initiatives, resulted in multiple arrests and the seizure of over $100,000 in Tether’s (USDT) stablecoin, per an Inc42 report on Tuesday, Oct. 15.

The scam centered on deceptive claims that the had received rights from the Ministry of Power to help India expand its solar power capacity to 450 gigawatts by 2030. Promising high returns, the scheme attracted numerous investors by falsely aligning itself with the nation’s renewable energy goals. Binance reported that the fraud gained momentum on social media, where scammers impersonated high-ranking officials and used the names of prominent dignitaries to bolster credibility.

Victims were deceived by fake earnings reports, allegedly from previous investors, which the syndicate used to build trust in the scheme, while investigators discovered that multiple SIM cards had been activated under the identities of unsuspecting individuals to conceal the perpetrators’ true identities. Some of these SIM cards were even sent overseas, adding complexity to the investigation, the report reads.

Funds from victims were funneled through various bank accounts, with some converted into crypto, further complicating tracing efforts. Binance assisted Delhi Police by providing analytical support, helping investigators track the financial transactions involved, the report reads.

This development follows Binance’s recent re-entry into India, where it registered as a reporting entity with the Financial Intelligence Unit as part of ongoing efforts to comply with local regulations amid a crackdown on unregistered crypto platforms.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

OSCE hosts workshop aimed at crypto regulation in Eastern Europe

The OSCE’s recent workshop brought together regulators from Ukraine, Moldova, and Armenia to address the urgent need for crypto regulations in the face of rising financial risks.

Eastern Europe is doubling down on regulatory measures for crypto exchanges as the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe hosts a workshop aimed at enhancing compliance and mitigating financial risks in the digital asset space.

In an Oct. 11 press release, the OSCE revealed that from Oct. 9 to Oct. 11, it convened a workshop in Vienna aimed at bolstering the regulatory framework for Virtual Asset Service Providers across Ukraine, Moldova, and Armenia.

The event, organized by the Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities, focused on enhancing participants’ ability to “mitigate money laundering and terrorism financing risks within the evolving digital asset ecosystem,” according to the press release. Led by OSCE financial regulation experts, the workshop featured a mix of discussions and interactive sessions designed to engage participants in practical compliance challenges.

“This workshop is a vital step in building the capacity of financial regulators to address the growing risks posed by virtual assets.”

Vera Strobachova-Budway, acting head of the economic governance unit at OCEEA

Key modules addressed pressing issues in VASP compliance, including anti-money laundering measures and counter-terrorism financing strategies. Participants also received “hands-on tools for supervising VASPs and analyzing suspicious activity,” equipping them with advanced skills in identifying and mitigating risks, per the press release.

OSCE elevates standards for crypto regulation

The workshop marks another step in the OSCE’s effort to formalize best practices in crypto regulation, fostering collaboration among regional regulators and financial experts. The initiative is part of a broader project aimed at regulating crypto businesses, supported by Germany, Italy, and the United States, among others.

Earlier in August, the OSCE also conducted a three-day training in Warsaw to enhance crypto investigation skills for Armenian and Georgian law enforcement. This specialized session on “countering blockchain obfuscation techniques” was part of ongoing efforts to combat illicit activities facilitated by cryptocurrencies.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Nigerian court denies Binance executive’s health bail application

A Nigerian court denied bail for Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan, who is facing money laundering charges, despite concerns over his deteriorating health.

A Nigerian court on Friday, Oct. 11, rejected a bail application on medical grounds for Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan, who is facing trial on charges of money laundering and currency manipulation.

According to a Bloomberg report, despite denying bail, the court instructed prison officials to refer Gambaryan to a hospital for treatment. U.S. lawmakers have criticized his detention as unjust, while his legal team has repeatedly raised concerns about his deteriorating health, which they say requires surgery.

In September, Gambaryan’s lawyer Mark Mordi informed the court that the executive has been awaiting surgery since mid-July and that his condition requires urgent care not available in prison. Mordi outlined several health issues affecting Gambaryan, including malaria, pneumonia, tonsillitis, and complications from a herniated disc, which have at times required the Binance executive to use a wheelchair.

The court had previously deferred a bail decision in September before denying this latest request.

Gambaryan, Binance’s head of financial crime compliance, who holds American citizenship, was arrested alongside his colleague, British-Kenyan Nadeem Anjarwalla, by Nigerian law enforcement in February. The two were captured at an Abuja airport after authorities called for Binance representatives to come to the capital city. After their arrest, all naira and peer-to-peer services on Binance in Nigeria were halted.

Anjarwalla fled the country in March using a concealed Kenyan passport. Later, reports surfaced saying Nigerian security forces were able to identify the location of the Binance representative, arresting him in Kenya at the request of the Nigerian Bureau of Interpol.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

UK trader denies charges in first-ever illegal crypto ATM prosecution

A London trader has pleaded not guilty to operating an illegal crypto ATM business and laundering $395,000 in criminal cash.

Habibur Rahman, a crypto trader from East Ham, London, has pleaded not guilty to charges related to operating an illegal crypto ATM business and laundering £300,000 (around $395,000) in criminal cash.

Rahman was arrested in April 2023 after police searched his mobile phone shop in Chatham, Kent, seizing several crypto ATMs, BBC reports, citing a spokesperson for Kent Police. The FCA mandates that all crypto ATM operators must register with the agency, a requirement that Rahman allegedly ignored.

During his court appearance at Medway Magistrates’ Court, he faced charges of running an unregulated business and illegally converting cash into crypto between April and June 2022. Matthew Long, the FCA’s director of payments and digital assets, reiterated the dangers associated with crypto investments, stating “if you are using one of these machines, you could be handing your money to criminals.”

The FCA has recently expanded its enforcement actions, evident in a separate case involving Olumide Osunkoya, another London trader charged with unlawfully operating multiple crypto ATMs that processed £2.6 million (at the time $3.4 million) in transactions. Subsequently, Osunkoya pleaded guilty to five offenses related to running an illegal network of crypto ATMs, marking the U.K.’s first conviction of its kind.

This case underscores the FCA’s ongoing crackdown on unregistered crypto activities and reflects a broader initiative to enhance regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency sector. As the risks associated with these operations continue to grow, the FCA appears to be increasingly vigilant in its efforts to protect consumers and maintain financial integrity.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

New industry billionaires: US regulators received over $32b from crypto companies

U.S. regulators have imposed $32 billion in fines on crypto companies to resolve compliance disputes. Who did they make the most money from?

Of the total, a record $19.45 billion came in 2024. This is due to the $12.7 billion payment to FTX and Alameda Research. In August, Judge Peter Castel ruled that the firms must pay, jointly and severally, $8.7 billion in restitution to those who suffered losses. In addition, the agreement calls for a $4 billion fee to be paid in return for the ill-gotten gains.

The settlement with Terraform Labs brought regulators $4.5 billion in 2024. The firm will pay about $3.59 billion in interest and a fine of $420 million. Its founder, Do Kwon, will pay $204.3 million in interest, fines, and compensation and must accrue at least the same amount to the “bankruptcy estate,” which will be distributed among investors.

Among the most significant fines were Binance’s $4.3 billion and Celsius’s $4.7 billion, which occurred in 2023. As part of the case, the largest crypto exchange was ordered to pay a fine of $1.81 billion in a criminal case and will lose $2.51 billion in compensation.

“The leading global crypto exchange agreed to plead guilty in November 2023, to resolve lawsuits with multiple U.S. regulators including the Department of Justice (DOJ), Treasury Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).”

CoinGecko report

As for the Celsius fine, in 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement against the Celsius Network. As part of the agreement, Celsius and its subsidiaries were prohibited from offering, selling, or promoting any product or service that may be “used to deposit, exchange, invest, or withdraw any asset.”

Source: CoinGecko

Terra was the catalyst for the bear market, followed by the bankruptcy of Celsius, and culminated in the collapse of FTX in November 2022. Of these crypto platforms, only Binance remains operational, remaining the largest centralized exchange by trading volume.

However, the sharp increase in recovery amounts occurred in 2023, when the total amount of settlements for claims by U.S. government agencies amounted to $10.87 billion across eight cases.

When did the significant crypto enforcement actions in the U.S. occur?

The last two years have seen many crypto enforcement actions in the U.S. Of the 25 significant actions, 16 were carried out in this period, reflecting increased regulatory scrutiny following the FTX collapse in late 2022. In 2023, law enforcement agencies settled eight lawsuits for $10.87 billion, a record and an increase of 8,327.1% over the previous year.

In 2024, another eight settlements were reached for $19.45 billion. With only a few months left, the settlement value 2024 has already increased by 78.9% over the previous year.

“Given that U.S. regulators show no signs of slowing down crypto industry scrutiny, 2024 may be on track to record more lawsuit settlements than last year.”

CoinGecko report

From 2019 to 2022, American regulators also made progress in major cryptocurrency litigation. The first significant settlement came in late 2019 with Block.one, when the SEC reached a $24 million settlement over unregistered securities sales. In 2020, the SEC successfully settled two major cases: BitClave for $29.34 million in May and Telegram for $1.24 billion.

In 2021, three significant cases occurred amid rising crypto prices. Tether agreed to pay $18.5 million and then $41 million in a settlement with the CFTC. Poloniex and BitMEX also reached settlements in their lawsuits for $10.39 million and $100 million, respectively. In 2022, BlockFi reached a $100 million settlement with the SEC, and Bittrex reached a $29 million settlement with the Treasury Department.

Actual deductions may be even higher

At the same time, CoinGecko experts did not consider fines and other payments imposed by the CFTC on individual top managers.

In particular, not long ago, the founder of Binance agreed to pay a $50 million fine and voluntarily arrived for a court hearing from the UAE to the United States.

Another case concerns the charges against the BitMEX crypto exchange in 2020. Then, U.S. regulators brought charges against BitMEX and its three founders, including Arthur Hayes, the head of the exchange. Hayes left the company, pleaded guilty, paid a fine of $10 million, and was sentenced to two years of probation.

The total fines for just two individuals was a whopping $60 million. However, the regulators have a history of other personal fines, therefore the actual revenues for the regulators may be several billion dollars more.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News

Uyeda: SEC’s crypto approach a ‘disaster for the whole industry’

In a candid interview on Fox Business’s Mornings with Maria, SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda sharply criticized the agency’s handling of crypto, acknowledging that its current strategy has been “a disaster for the whole industry.”

Uyeda’s remarks come amid mounting legal challenges, including a fresh lawsuit filed by Crypto.com against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission following the issuance of a Wells notice.

Crypto.com’s lawsuit alleges that the SEC has overstepped its jurisdiction by enforcing regulations on the cryptocurrency market without issuing clear regulatory guidance. The Wells notice — a formal communication from the SEC indicating that enforcement action is likely — accused Crypto.com of operating as an unregistered broker-dealer and securities clearing agency due to its handling of tokens that the SEC deems securities.

Uyeda’s critique of the SEC’s approach highlights a growing frustration within the agency and the wider crypto industry.

“We have been sending this ‘policy through enforcement,’” Uyeda stated, referring to the SEC’s practice of targeting companies with legal actions without offering explicit guidance on how they should operate within existing regulations. “We’ve done nothing to provide guidance on it,” he continued. “And as a result, this has been shaped by the courts. And different courts have ruled in different ways.”

Indeed, the SEC’s reliance on enforcement has led to legal battles, including a high-profile case against Ripple Labs

The courts have often delivered mixed rulings, adding to the uncertainty for crypto firms. While the SEC recently lost a major ruling to Ripple (XRP) regarding the classification of XRP tokens, the agency has already filed an appeal, signaling that these legal struggles are far from over.

Crypto firms are fighting back

Crypto.com’s lawsuit is just the latest in a series of legal confrontations between the crypto industry and the SEC. The lawsuit, sparked by the Wells notice, argues that the agency has been regulating beyond its mandate. Crypto.com’s leadership insists that legal action is necessary to protect the future of cryptocurrency innovation in the United States.

Mark Uyeda refrained from commenting directly on the Crypto.com litigation, but he emphasized the broader issue of the SEC’s failure to offer clarity. “We have not provided interpretive guidance as to what you can and cannot do,” Uyeda said, adding that the lack of clear rules has left companies guessing about how to comply with securities laws.

Uyeda’s comments also touched on the SEC’s broader regulatory philosophy, particularly in relation to environmental, social, and governance mandates. He criticized the agency’s focus on ESG issues, suggesting that such efforts often stray from financial relevance. “It is about micromanaging a lot of what corporations are doing on things that have absolutely no financial purpose,” he said, adding that financial regulators should not be vehicles for social change.

Tổng hợp và chỉnh sửa: ThS Phạm Mạnh Cường
Theo Crypto News